Management is not an evil thing. MWT is not anti-management. In fact, in half a MWT organisation there is more risk than in a normal organisation (or a full MWT organisation, of course). If you see MWT as risky you are only seeing half of the MWT solution.

Traditional management tasks have been designed with one purpose in mind. They have been designed to allow somebody no more competent than any other person to manage other people.

In any other situation the cost of managers would be too high. If managers were valued 'on the margin', such that any particular manager (as opposed to management skills in general) was more highly valued than an other manager, management costs for an organisation would simply be too high.

In a (full) MWT organisation managers really are valued on the margin. Management tasks aren't valued in themselves; so good and bad managers are more likely to be distinguished. Once the organisation can make this distinction managers can be paid differing salaries.

The problem with half a MWT organisation is simply the risk that the organisation cannot yet properly distinguish between good and bad managers and yet there is a wide range of management salaries.

Beware of being half a MWT organisation...