I'm currently reading through Hayek's 'The Road to Serfdom'. The tone of the book often reflects its place in history in relation to WWII; for better and for worse.

I particularly like the observation that the personal attributes and values that make self-organisation possible are the same ones that make centralised control more difficult.

This is the problem with creating multi-disciplinary change. We have this intermediate non-stable state where things are difficult for everybody.

I am, of course, not the only one trying to understand how things like Austrian Economics apply to the organisation of firms. If you don't mind academic papers you might want to check out:

The Organisation of Large, Complex Firms: an Austrian View
http://www.cbs.dk/departments/ivs/wp/wp99-7.pdf

It makes the claim that there is a fundamental distinction between 'simple' and 'complex' firms relating to the 'division of knowledge' brought about by the division of labour. It suggests (as I do) that complex firms require a market-based analysis.

The division of knowledge a re-occuring theme for Hayek; the classic is:

Hayek, F.A., The Use of Knowledge in Society
http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/hykKnw1.html